December 7, 2021

Beyond Going Long

Complete UK News World

Google's Tensor chip is slower than the Apple A12 Bionic, a three-year-old SoC

Google’s Tensor chip is slower than the Apple A12 Bionic, a three-year-old SoC

Before Google officially announced its Tensor chip, it was said that the company would not focus on making this SoC the fastest on the planet. Instead, the release will likely focus more on efficiency than anything else, and according to this comparative comparison, those rumors were true. However, it is terrible to see the flagship of the chipset unable to compete with the A12 Bionic, Apple’s proprietary silicon, which was released three years ago.

Tensor fails to beat A12 Bionic in single-core or multi-core tests

The performance comparison provided by 9ekt on Twitter shows the Geekbench 5 score belonging to Tensor and the A12 Bionic. Unfortunately, Apple chips outperformed Tensor three years ago in single-core and multi-core tests, and these numbers, of course, will confuse potential customers. The first thing he will likely ask himself is why Google has refrained from using Qualcomm as its supplier for the Snapdragon 888.

Google lowered Play Store subscription fee to 15% for all Android developers

In this way, the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro will remain at least competitors to the rest of the main camp of Android smartphones. While we agree that these numbers are more disappointing than disappointing, keep in mind that benchmark results only tell half the story, and what you see may not necessarily translate into real-world performance. We also have to take into account the optimization bits.

Qualcomm’s chipsets haven’t been overheating outside, as evidenced by the use of the Pixel 5a, which doesn’t even use the flagship SoC from the San Diego chip giant. With Tensor, Google may have sacrificed the performance aspects of the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro, but with additional control over both hardware and software, it’s possible that the OS will run more smoothly on the latest flagships than competitors. Headphones with minimal drops and jerks.

See also  Nikon has a new flagship, the Z 9 is coming

The unsatisfactory single-core and multi-core scores can also be attributed to Tensor’s energy-efficient positioning, perhaps Google intentionally wanted this chip not to have enough power to provide the best battery life for Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro owners. . You will often check smartphone hardware specs and be amazed at what is put on paper to keep you frustrated and angry at the drastic levels of software improvement.

Google may have a completely different plan with Tensor, but we don’t expect to see those results soon. When the first commercial reviews of the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro are released, we’ll update our readers accordingly, so stay tuned.

news source: 9 leaks